Re: Timestamp Conversion Woes Redux - Mailing list pgsql-jdbc

From Dave Cramer
Subject Re: Timestamp Conversion Woes Redux
Date
Msg-id F84A33B1-609F-4E31-835D-C89E3372B349@fastcrypt.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Timestamp Conversion Woes Redux  (Oliver Jowett <oliver@opencloud.com>)
Responses Re: Timestamp Conversion Woes Redux
List pgsql-jdbc
Oliver,

Sorry for bringing this up again. I realize we have discussed this
before.

by typing it as UNKNOWN we are letting the backend decide what to do
with it. There is considerable code in there to do the "right" thing.

Dave
On 19-Jul-05, at 8:45 AM, Oliver Jowett wrote:

> Dave Cramer wrote:
>
>> Can you explain your rationale ?
>>
>
> I don't really want to rehash this again and again, but it boils
> down to: if setString() does not type the parameter as a string,
> how *do* I type a parameter as a string?
>
> I do not find "there are lots of broken applications out there" a
> particularly convincing argument for changing this.
>
> -O
>
>


pgsql-jdbc by date:

Previous
From: Oliver Jowett
Date:
Subject: Re: Timestamp Conversion Woes Redux
Next
From: Oliver Jowett
Date:
Subject: Re: Timestamp Conversion Woes Redux