Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> One issue I do have to deal with right now is how many autovacuum
> processes do we want to be running. The current approach is to have one
> autovacuum process. Two possible options would be to have one per
> database, and one per tablespace. What do people think?
Why do we need more than one pg_autovacuum process? (Note that this need
not necessarily imply only one concurrent VACUUM, as you can use
non-blocking connections in libpq.)
-Neil
