Re: [HACKERS] plperl and pltcl installcheck targets - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: [HACKERS] plperl and pltcl installcheck targets
Date
Msg-id 42864944.80405@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] plperl and pltcl installcheck targets  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] plperl and pltcl installcheck targets  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-patches

Peter Eisentraut wrote:

>Tom Lane wrote:
>
>
>>It occurs to me that maybe we should just add src/pl to the toplevel
>>installcheck target, which would make the whole thing pretty
>>automatic.  However, contrib isn't in that target, so maybe the PLs
>>shouldn't be either.  Thoughts?
>>
>>
>
>Contrib isn't built by default, so it isn't tested by default.  But the
>PLs that are built should also be tested, I think.
>
>
>

I agree. That will also mean that buildfarm members will automatically
start doing the checks (as long as they are set up to build the PLs), so
it would be an extra bonus for me :-)

cheers

andrew

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] plperl and pltcl installcheck targets
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] plperl and pltcl installcheck targets