Re: [HACKERS] plperl and pltcl installcheck targets - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: [HACKERS] plperl and pltcl installcheck targets
Date
Msg-id 200505142036.37451.peter_e@gmx.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] plperl and pltcl installcheck targets  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] plperl and pltcl installcheck targets  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
List pgsql-patches
Tom Lane wrote:
> It occurs to me that maybe we should just add src/pl to the toplevel
> installcheck target, which would make the whole thing pretty
> automatic.  However, contrib isn't in that target, so maybe the PLs
> shouldn't be either.  Thoughts?

Contrib isn't built by default, so it isn't tested by default.  But the
PLs that are built should also be tested, I think.

--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] plperl and pltcl installcheck targets
Next
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] plperl and pltcl installcheck targets