Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement
Date
Msg-id 4276974D.1070400@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement  ("Jim C. Nasby" <decibel@decibel.org>)
List pgsql-hackers

Jim C. Nasby wrote:

>On Mon, May 02, 2005 at 04:53:59PM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>  
>
>>See my cross-posting where I specifically state I have no plans for 
>>buildfarm to test things outside core. It's doable in principle, but 
>>would involve huge amounts of work, for which I at least (as buildfarm's 
>>creator/administrator) would not have time in the foreseeable future.
>>    
>>
>
>Would you be open to someone else adding the capability? And maybe
>mention that on the buildfarm site? (And before anyone asks, no, this
>doesn't interest me enough for me to do it :P)
>  
>

Of course. I won't hold my breath waiting, though :-)

cheers

andrew


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Jim C. Nasby"
Date:
Subject: Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1
Next
From: "Dave Held"
Date:
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Decision Process WAS: Increased company involvement