Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jim C. Nasby
Subject Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement
Date
Msg-id 20050502210237.GY47820@decibel.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Responses Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, May 02, 2005 at 04:53:59PM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> See my cross-posting where I specifically state I have no plans for 
> buildfarm to test things outside core. It's doable in principle, but 
> would involve huge amounts of work, for which I at least (as buildfarm's 
> creator/administrator) would not have time in the foreseeable future.

Would you be open to someone else adding the capability? And maybe
mention that on the buildfarm site? (And before anyone asks, no, this
doesn't interest me enough for me to do it :P)
-- 
Jim C. Nasby, Database Consultant               decibel@decibel.org 
Give your computer some brain candy! www.distributed.net Team #1828

Windows: "Where do you want to go today?"
Linux: "Where do you want to go tomorrow?"
FreeBSD: "Are you guys coming, or what?"


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Rosser Schwarz
Date:
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Decision Process WAS: Increased company
Next
From: "Jim C. Nasby"
Date:
Subject: Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1