Re: [GENERAL] plPHP in core? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Joshua D. Drake
Subject Re: [GENERAL] plPHP in core?
Date
Msg-id 424EB82E.7010709@commandprompt.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [GENERAL] plPHP in core?  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Responses Re: [GENERAL] plPHP in core?
List pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut wrote:

>Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>
>
>>We at Command Prompt are in the process of completing
>>a new rev of plPHP. The new rev will not require the
>>PHP source. It will only require that PHP is installed.
>>
>>
>
>How can that be?
>
>
I am not sure I understand the question but we are
linking against the .so now. So as long as PHP
is and PostgreSQL ./configure knows where to look
we should be good.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake

>
>
>>Are we interested in having plPHP in core?
>>
>>
>
>Personally, I'm not too excited about it.
>
>
>


--
Command Prompt, Inc., home of Mammoth PostgreSQL - S/ODBC and S/JDBC
Postgresql support, programming shared hosting and dedicated hosting.
+1-503-667-4564 - jd@commandprompt.com - http://www.commandprompt.com
PostgreSQL Replicator -- production quality replication for PostgreSQL


Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Hans-Jürgen Schönig
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] plPHP in core?
Next
From: Dave Cramer
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] plPHP in core?