pl-j ( the other java procedural language ) is definately interested in
being in core.
Dave
Tom Lane wrote:
>"Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org> writes:
>
>
>>On Fri, 1 Apr 2005, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Are we interested in having plPHP in core?
>>>
>>>
>
>
>
>>Is there a reason why it can no longer operate as a standalone language
>>out of pgfoundry, like pl/java and pl/perl?
>>
>>
>
>PLs are sufficiently tightly tied to the core that it's probably
>easier to maintain them as part of our core CVS than otherwise.
>(Ask Joe Conway about PL/R. Thomas Hallgren is probably not that
>happy about maintaining pl/java out of core, either. And pl/perl
>*is* in core.)
>
>I'm thinking that a pl/PHP is much more interesting for the long term
>than, say, pl/tcl (mind you, I am a Tcl partisan from way back, but
>I see that many people are not so enlightened). Barring any licensing
>problems I think this is something to pursue.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
>---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo@postgresql.org
>
>
>
>
