Dave Cramer wrote:
> pl-j ( the other java procedural language ) is definately interested
> in being in core.
>
Is it actively developed? Not being rude... I just haven't heard much
(almost nothing) about it.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
> Dave
>
> Tom Lane wrote:
>
>> "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org> writes:
>>
>>
>>> On Fri, 1 Apr 2005, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Are we interested in having plPHP in core?
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> Is there a reason why it can no longer operate as a standalone
>>> language out of pgfoundry, like pl/java and pl/perl?
>>>
>>
>>
>> PLs are sufficiently tightly tied to the core that it's probably
>> easier to maintain them as part of our core CVS than otherwise.
>> (Ask Joe Conway about PL/R. Thomas Hallgren is probably not that
>> happy about maintaining pl/java out of core, either. And pl/perl
>> *is* in core.)
>>
>> I'm thinking that a pl/PHP is much more interesting for the long term
>> than, say, pl/tcl (mind you, I am a Tcl partisan from way back, but
>> I see that many people are not so enlightened). Barring any licensing
>> problems I think this is something to pursue.
>>
>> regards, tom lane
>>
>> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>> TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo@postgresql.org
>>
>>
>>
>>
--
Command Prompt, Inc., home of Mammoth PostgreSQL - S/ODBC and S/JDBC
Postgresql support, programming shared hosting and dedicated hosting.
+1-503-667-4564 - jd@commandprompt.com - http://www.commandprompt.com
PostgreSQL Replicator -- production quality replication for PostgreSQL
