Cott Lang wrote:
>Have you already considered application/database tuning? Adding
>indexes? shared_buffers large enough? etc.
>
>Your database doesn't seem that large for the hardware you've already
>got. I'd hate to spend $7k and end up back in the same boat. :)
>
>
Cott,
I agree with you. Unfortunately, I am not the developer of the
application. The vendor uses ProIV which connects via ODBC. The vendor
could certain do some tuning and create more indexes where applicable. I
am encouraging the vendor to take a more active role and we work
together on this.
With hardware tuning, I am sure we can do better than 35Mb per sec. Also
moving the top 3 or 5 tables and indexes to their own slice of a RAID10
and moving pg_xlog to its own drive will help too.
Since you asked about tuned settings, here's what we're using:
kernel.shmmax = 1073741824
shared_buffers = 10000
sort_mem = 8192
vacuum_mem = 65536
effective_cache_size = 65536
Steve Poe
