Greg Stark wrote:
>Arshavir Grigorian <ag@m-cam.com> writes:
>
>
>
>>Hi,
>>
>>I have a RAID5 array (mdadm) with 14 disks + 1 spare. This partition has an
>>Ext3 filesystem which is used by Postgres.
>>
>>
>
>People are going to suggest moving to RAID1+0. I'm unconvinced that RAID5
>across 14 drivers shouldn't be able to keep up with RAID1 across 7 drives
>though. It would be interesting to see empirical data.
>
>One thing that does scare me is the Postgres transaction log and the ext3
>journal both sharing these disks with the data. Ideally both of these things
>should get (mirrored) disks of their own separate from the data files.
>
>But 2-3s pauses seem disturbing. I wonder whether ext3 is issuing a cache
>flush on every fsync to get the journal pushed out. This is a new linux
>feature that's necessary with ide but shouldn't be necessary with scsi.
>
>It would be interesting to know whether postgres performs differently with
>fsync=off. This would even be a reasonable mode to run under for initial
>database loads. It shouldn't make much of a difference with hardware like this
>though. And you should be aware that running under this mode in production
>would put your data at risk.
>
Hi
I'm coming in from the raid list so I didn't get the full story.
May I ask what kernel?
I only ask because I upgraded to 2.6.11.2 and happened to be watching
xosview on my (probably) completely different setup (1Tb xfs/lvm2/raid5
served by nfs to a remote sustained read/write app), when I saw all read
activity cease for 2/3 seconds whilst the disk wrote, then disk read
resumed. This occured repeatedly during a read/edit/write of a 3Gb file.
Performance not critical here so on the "hmm, that's odd" todo list :)
David
