Mailing lists [pgsql-performance]

21 March 2005

• 01:18   Re: What needs to be done for real Partitioning? Greg Stark
• 02:02   Re: What needs to be done for real Partitioning? Tom Lane
• 02:05   Re: What needs to be done for real Partitioning? Tom Lane
• 02:15   Re: What needs to be done for real Partitioning? Greg Stark
• 07:01   Re: What needs to be done for real Partitioning? Greg Stark
• 07:04   View vs function Keith Worthington
• 07:07   Re: What needs to be done for real Partitioning? Greg Stark
• 07:41   Re: View vs function Bruno Wolff III
• 07:46   Re: cpu_tuple_cost Daniel Schuchardt
• 07:46   Re: Postgres on RAID5 David Dougall
• 07:47   Effect of Stripe Size (was Postgres on RAID5) Ruth Ivimey-Cook
• 07:48   Re: Postgres on RAID5 Michael Tokarev
• 07:49   Which one is faster: one way reading ="single pass reading" Rosny
• 07:49   Re: interesting benchmarks PG/Firebird Linux/Windows fsync/nofsync Qingqing Zhou
• 07:49   Hardware impact on performances Camille Chafer
• 07:50   Re: Questions about 2 databases. Mirko Zeibig
• 07:51   Re: Postgres on RAID5 Michael Tokarev
• 07:52   Re: column name is "LIMIT" Qingqing Zhou
• 07:52   Re: Postgres on RAID5 Guy
• 07:52   Re: Postgres on RAID5 (possible sync blocking read type David Greaves
• 08:13   Re: What needs to be done for real Partitioning? Stacy White
• 08:13   Re: View vs function Neil Conway
• 08:38   Re: What needs to be done for real Partitioning? Stacy White
• 09:40   Re: View vs function Tom Lane
• 12:55   Re: Hardware impact on performances Richard Huxton
• 13:06   What about utility to calculate planner cost constants? Tambet Matiisen
• 17:59   Re: column name is "LIMIT" Jan Wieck
• 19:30   Re: column name is "LIMIT" Tom Lane
• 20:51   Re: What about utility to calculate planner cost constants? Josh Berkus
• 20:55   Re: What needs to be done for real Partitioning? Josh Berkus
• 21:18   Re: What about utility to calculate planner cost constants? Thomas F.O'Connell