NTPT wrote:
>
> 3: One process, multiple threads, all threads share the same one
> persitant connection. Because one thread serve one request in present
> time, but threads can run "concurently" (AFIAK ), I am affraid, that
> multiple transactions over the single connection in this scenario will
> result a complette mess. I am right ?
Yes - that's the definition of a connection really. Each connection
provides you with a set of configuration values and a context for
transactions.
--
Richard Huxton
Archonet Ltd
