High end server and storage for a PostgreSQL OLTP system - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Cosimo Streppone
Subject High end server and storage for a PostgreSQL OLTP system
Date
Msg-id 41FE97FC.3060106@streppone.it
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: High end server and storage for a PostgreSQL OLTP system
Re: High end server and storage for a PostgreSQL OLTP system
List pgsql-performance
Hi all,

I've been following this list for nearly a year now.
I've always managed to get PostgreSQL 7.1.x right for the job,
which in my case is a large and complex oltp system,
run under Pg for 6 years now.

We were already planning the switch from 7.1 to 7.4 (or even 8.0).
The last project we're facing with has a transaction volume that is
something we've never dealt with. By "transaction" I mean
something involving 10 to 10,000 (and more) sql queries
(a complex mix of insert/ update/ delete/ select).

I'd like to ask:

1) What kind of performance gain can I expect switching from
    7.1 to 7.4 (or 8.0)? Obviously I'm doing my own testing,
    but I'm not very impressed by 8.0 speed, may be I'm doing
    testing on a low end server...

2) The goal is to make the db handle 100 tps (something like
    100 users). What kind of server and storage should I provide?

    The actual servers our application runs on normally have
    2 Intel Xeon processors, 2-4 Gb RAM, RAID 0/1/5 SCSI
    disk storage with hard drives @ 10,000 rpm

3) Highest I/O throughput SCSI adapters? Adaptec?

4) Is it correct to suppose that multiple RAID 1 arrays
    can provide the fastest I/O ?
    I usually reserve one RAID1 array to db data directory,
    one RAID1 array to pg_xlog directory and one RAID1 array
    for os and application needs.

5) OS and Pg specific tuning?
    Usually I modify shared memory settings and most of postgresql.conf
    available settings for 7.1, like `effective_cache', `shared_buffers',
    `wal_buffers', `wal_files', and so on.

--
Cosimo


pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Automagic tuning
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: High end server and storage for a PostgreSQL OLTP system