Re: Status of PostgreSQL for 4+ processors - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Neil Conway
Subject Re: Status of PostgreSQL for 4+ processors
Date
Msg-id 41F73CEA.6090109@samurai.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Status of PostgreSQL for 4+ processors  (Benjamin Arai <barai@cs.ucr.edu>)
List pgsql-hackers
Benjamin Arai wrote:
> I have been trying to find information on PostgreSQL for running it on 
> greater then 4 processors.  Are there any benchmarks out there and have 
> there been any problems or does anybody forsee any issues running 
> PostgreSQL with more then 4 processors?

There shouldn't be any issues with running on large SMP machines. There 
has been some speculation that lock contention (specifically for the 
BufMgrLock) might hurt performance somewhat on machines with > 4 
processors, but I don't know to what degree. In any case, you should 
certainly be able to *use* PG; how well it will perform on a many-way 
SMP box relative to, say, Oracle, I'm not sure.

-Neil


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Christopher Browne
Date:
Subject: Re: OLS BOF for linux & postgresql
Next
From: Neil Conway
Date:
Subject: Re: Patent issues and 8.1