Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

26 January 2005

• 00:09   Re: Autotuning Group Commit Simon Riggs
• 00:15   Performance of the temporary table creation and use. Luiz Gonzaga da Mata
• 00:18   Re: Some things I like to pick from the TODO list ... Andreas Pflug
• 00:22   Re: userlock changes for 8.1/8.2 Tom Lane
• 00:42   Re: Vacuum Looping 7.4 Tom Lane
• 00:47   Re: RQ: Prepared statements used by multiple connections Michael Fuhr
• 00:47   Re: Autotuning Group Commit Tom Lane
• 00:50   Re: Shortcut for defining triggers Jim C. Nasby
• 00:53   Re: Shortcut for defining triggers Jim C. Nasby
• 00:55   Re: Performance of the temporary table creation and use. Tom Lane
• 00:58   Re: userlock changes for 8.1/8.2 Jim C. Nasby
• 01:13   Re: userlock changes for 8.1/8.2 Merlin Moncure
• 01:17   Re: Concurrent free-lock Simon Riggs
• 02:13   Patent issues and 8.1 Bruce Momjian
• 02:14   Re: Shortcut for defining triggers David Fetter
• 02:23   Re: Patent issues and 8.1 Marc G. Fournier
• 02:27   Re: Concurrent free-lock Jonah H. Harris
• 02:30   Re: Performance of the temporary table creation and use. Dann Corbit
• 02:31   Re: Patent issues and 8.1 Bruce Momjian
• 03:59   OLS BOF for linux & postgresql Mark Wong
• 04:11   Re: Patent issues and 8.1 Marc G. Fournier
• 04:52   Re: [PATCHES] Merge pg_shadow && pg_group -- UNTESTED Stephen Frost
• 05:30   Re: Concurrent free-lock Neil Conway
• 07:33   Re: bug w/ cursors and savepoints Neil Conway
• 07:36   Re: Performance of the temporary table creation and use. Michael Adler
• 07:40   Re: Patent issues and 8.1 Neil Conway
• 08:02   Re: Patent issues and 8.1 Tom Lane
• 08:03   Status of PostgreSQL for 4+ processors Benjamin Arai
• 08:43   Re: OLS BOF for linux & postgresql Christopher Browne
• 09:47   Re: Status of PostgreSQL for 4+ processors Neil Conway
• 10:09   Re: Patent issues and 8.1 Neil Conway
• 10:50   Re: Concurrent free-lock Simon Riggs
• 13:26   Re: Patent issues and 8.1 Michael Paesold
• 14:20   Re: Patent issues and 8.1 Hannu Krosing
• 14:22   Re: Concurrent free-lock Pailloncy Jean-Gerard
• 14:29   Re: Patent issues and 8.1 Pailloncy Jean-Gerard
• 14:30   Re: Patent issues and 8.1 Hannu Krosing
• 14:40   Re: RQ: Prepared statements used by multiple connections Bojidar Mihajlov
• 14:50   IBM patent Tommi Maekitalo
• 16:06   Re: WAL: O_DIRECT and multipage-writer ITAGAKI Takahiro
• 16:21   Re: how to add a new column in pg_proc table noman naeem
• 16:27   Re: [ODBC] RQ: Prepared statements used by multiple connections Merlin Moncure
• 18:02   Re: bug w/ cursors and savepoints Alvaro Herrera
• 18:14   Re: Patent issues and 8.1 Tom Lane
• 18:20   Backporting pg_dump to 7.4 Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 19:15   Re: Performance of the temporary table creation and use. Luiz Gonzaga da Mata
• 19:56   Re: bug w/ cursors and savepoints Alvaro Herrera
• 20:58   Data statement format used by the .sh scripts noman naeem
• 21:03   Re: Patent issues and 8.1 Marc G. Fournier
• 21:12   Deferrable Unique Constraints George Essig
• 21:15   cvs TIP, tsearch2 and Solaris 8 Sparc Darcy Buskermolen
• 21:36   Re: [GENERAL] visualizing B-tree index coverage Dann Corbit
• 21:50   Re: cvs TIP, tsearch2 and Solaris 8 Sparc Tom Lane
• 22:41   Re: Deferrable Unique Constraints Greg Stark
• 22:51   Re: Patent issues and 8.1 Serguei A. Mokhov
• 22:58   Re: Deferrable Unique Constraints Tom Lane
• 23:05   Re: cvs TIP, tsearch2 and Solaris 8 Sparc Jim Buttafuoco
• 23:07   Re: Patent issues and 8.1 Serguei A. Mokhov
• 23:48   Re: Deferrable Unique Constraints Greg Stark