Re: Versioned vs unversioned jarfile names? - Mailing list pgsql-jdbc

From Dave Cramer
Subject Re: Versioned vs unversioned jarfile names?
Date
Msg-id 41F53603.50402@fastcrypt.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Versioned vs unversioned jarfile names?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-jdbc
We could certainly provide symlinks with specific information. We do
have an interesting problem that most others don't ie API versions.

How about publishing them to jpackage.org ?

Dave

Tom Lane wrote:

>I have a request filed here:
>https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=145744
>to supply version-less symlinks for the JDBC jarfiles that are
>distributed in the Postgres RPMs.  Does anyone have a comment
>on whether this is a good or bad idea?
>
>I personally thought that it would be better to use names that aren't
>totally versionless, but include some sort of major version number that
>indicates API level, or something like that.  But I don't know what
>would be appropriate.  Thoughts welcome.
>
>            regards, tom lane
>
>---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend
>
>
>
>

--
Dave Cramer
http://www.postgresintl.com
519 939 0336
ICQ#14675561


pgsql-jdbc by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Versioned vs unversioned jarfile names?
Next
From: "Jean-Pierre Pelletier"
Date:
Subject: setObject on PGInterval throws "Unknown Type null"