Versioned vs unversioned jarfile names? - Mailing list pgsql-jdbc

From Tom Lane
Subject Versioned vs unversioned jarfile names?
Date
Msg-id 22675.1106588112@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: Versioned vs unversioned jarfile names?  (Dave Cramer <pg@fastcrypt.com>)
Re: Versioned vs unversioned jarfile names?  (Kris Jurka <books@ejurka.com>)
List pgsql-jdbc
I have a request filed here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=145744
to supply version-less symlinks for the JDBC jarfiles that are
distributed in the Postgres RPMs.  Does anyone have a comment
on whether this is a good or bad idea?

I personally thought that it would be better to use names that aren't
totally versionless, but include some sort of major version number that
indicates API level, or something like that.  But I don't know what
would be appropriate.  Thoughts welcome.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-jdbc by date:

Previous
From: "Barry Lind"
Date:
Subject: Re: PGResultSetMetaData
Next
From: Dave Cramer
Date:
Subject: Re: Versioned vs unversioned jarfile names?