Re: ARC patent - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Joshua D. Drake
Subject Re: ARC patent
Date
Msg-id 41EC18AD.90506@commandprompt.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: ARC patent  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: ARC patent
Re: ARC patent
List pgsql-hackers
>However, I don't want to be beholden to IBM indefinitely --- in five
>years their corporate strategy might change.  I think that a reasonable
>response to this is to plan to get rid of ARC, or at least modify the
>code enough to avoid the patent, in time for 8.1.  (It's entirely likely
>that that will happen before the patent issues, anyway.)
>
>            regards, tom lane
>
>
IBM makes 20% of their money from licensing patents.

That alone makes this whole conversation scare the hell out of
me.

We should be as proactive as possible with this and remove
the code (or modify as required).

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake




>---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
>
>


--
Command Prompt, Inc., home of Mammoth PostgreSQL - S/ODBC and S/JDBC
Postgresql support, programming shared hosting and dedicated hosting.
+1-503-667-4564 - jd@commandprompt.com - http://www.commandprompt.com
PostgreSQL Replicator -- production quality replication for PostgreSQL


Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] %2$, %1$ gettext placeholder replacement is not working under Win32
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: ARC patent