Re: pgplsql SELECT INTO ... FOR UPDATE (transaction/locking - Mailing list pgsql-general

From John Sidney-Woollett
Subject Re: pgplsql SELECT INTO ... FOR UPDATE (transaction/locking
Date
Msg-id 41C01197.8000407@wardbrook.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to pgplsql SELECT INTO ... FOR UPDATE (transaction/locking question)  (Eric Brown <eric.brown@propel.com>)
List pgsql-general
I've got a few plpgsql stored functions (in 7.4.x) that use the

select x into y from table where condition for update

syntax without any problem.

Maybe there's something else going on?

John Sidney-Woollett

Eric Brown wrote:

> I'm trying to write a stored procedure in plpgsql that selects a row and
> possibly increments one of its fields. I thought I would do SELECT INTO
> my_record * FROM my_table FOR UPDATE WHERE ..., but apparently plpgsql
> doesn't like the FOR UPDATE in a stored procedure. Does plpgsql
> automatically lock any rows I read until the stored procedure exits? I'm
> just not sure how to get the functionality I'm looking for and not have
> to concern myself with concurrency.
>
> Example:
> create table t_test (x int, y int);
> create or replace function f_test(int) returns void as '
> declare r record;
> begin
>   select into r *, oid from t_test -- FOR UPDATE
>     where x = $1;
>   if found then
>     update t_test set y=y+1 where oid = r.oid;
>   end if;
>   return;
> end' language plpgsql;
> insert into t_test values (1,1);
> select f_test(1);
>

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Eric Brown
Date:
Subject: pgplsql SELECT INTO ... FOR UPDATE (transaction/locking question)
Next
From: Daniel Martini
Date:
Subject: Re: Connect to Postgres 7.4 via ODBC