Re: [pgsql-www] PostgreSQL.org Design Proposal - Mailing list pgsql-advocacy

From Ned Lilly
Subject Re: [pgsql-www] PostgreSQL.org Design Proposal
Date
Msg-id 417FE0C2.2030407@nedscape.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [pgsql-www] PostgreSQL.org Design Proposal  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Responses Re: [pgsql-www] PostgreSQL.org Design Proposal
List pgsql-advocacy
Joshua D. Drake wrote:

> Ned Lilly wrote:
>
>> I like it too, very much.  Only question is, how does the design scale
>> to 800x600, which should probably still be the minimum?
>
>
> I seriously doubt anyone trying to use PostgreSQL is stuck at 800x600.
> 1024x768 is probably good enough. It does fix in 1024x768 btw :)

Well, that's a call for the design pros.  But take a look at leading mass-market sites - Yahoo, AOL, eBay, NY Times,
etc. They're still hardcoded to 800. 

pgsql-advocacy by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] PostgreSQL.org Design Proposal
Next
From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] PostgreSQL.org Design Proposal