Re: [pgsql-advocacy] PostgreSQL.org Design Proposal - Mailing list pgsql-www

From Joshua D. Drake
Subject Re: [pgsql-advocacy] PostgreSQL.org Design Proposal
Date
Msg-id 417FD5FE.8070501@commandprompt.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to PostgreSQL.org Design Proposal  (Omar Kilani <omar@tinysofa.org>)
Responses Re: [pgsql-advocacy] PostgreSQL.org Design Proposal
Re: [pgsql-advocacy] PostgreSQL.org Design Proposal
List pgsql-www
Ned Lilly wrote:
> I like it too, very much.  Only question is, how does the design scale
> to 800x600, which should probably still be the minimum?

I seriously doubt anyone trying to use PostgreSQL is stuck at 800x600.
1024x768 is probably good enough. It does fix in 1024x768 btw :)

The only part that I don't like is the big old elephant. Although I
think it is a nice touch, I think it takes to much away from the info
being presented.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake



>
>
>
> Gavin M. Roy wrote:
>
>> I love it, it's very well done, professional, and fresh.
>>
>> Gavin
>>
>> Omar Kilani wrote:
>>
>>> Dear PostgreSQL Users and Developers,
>>>
>>> We would like to propose the following design as the basis for a new
>>> postgresql.org.
>>>
>>> http://treehou.se/~emily/postgresql_design_proposal.png
>>>
>>> We are submitting this proposal as we, and many other users and
>>> developers, feel that the current site portrays PostgreSQL in a less
>>> than flattering light.
>>>
>>> Whilst the beta concept design is a great improvement upon the
>>> existing site, we believe that our design proposal conveys a
>>> professional image and portrays PostgreSQL as distinct amongst open
>>> source projects that use a similar look and feel to the beta site.
>>>
>>> Additionally, this proposal focuses on reducing information overload,
>>> providing a clean interface while simplifying and consolidating the
>>> vast amount of material on the site.
>>>
>>> A survey of users and colleagues suggests that there may be interest
>>> in adopting this design, and so, we would like to know if there is
>>> interest amongst pgsql-www and pgsql-advocacy.
>>>
>>> We are willing to move forward with the design of the rest of the
>>> site if there is some interest in our proposal. We estimate that full
>>> migration and consolidation of current content and sites would take
>>> approximately one month, if not less, using a content management
>>> system to ease administration and maintenance. The main site can be
>>> finished in line with the release of PostgreSQL 8, which I understand
>>> is a couple of weeks away.
>>>
>>> Thanks for your time.
>>>
>>> Best Regards,
>>> Omar Kilani
>>>  - and -
>>> Emily Boyd
>>>
>>> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>>> TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>> TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
>>      subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your
>>      message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
>    (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo@postgresql.org)


--
Command Prompt, Inc., home of PostgreSQL Replication, and plPHP.
Postgresql support, programming shared hosting and dedicated hosting.
+1-503-667-4564 - jd@commandprompt.com - http://www.commandprompt.com
Mammoth PostgreSQL Replicator. Integrated Replication for PostgreSQL

Attachment

pgsql-www by date:

Previous
From: Mitch Pirtle
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL.org Design Proposal
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] PostgreSQL.org Design Proposal