Re: VACUUM FULL on 24/7 server - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Gaetano Mendola
Subject Re: VACUUM FULL on 24/7 server
Date
Msg-id 416189BC.7010309@bigfoot.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to VACUUM FULL on 24/7 server  (Aleksey Serba <aserba@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-general
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


Matthew T. O'Connor wrote:
| Gaetano Mendola wrote:
|
|> Matthew T. O'Connor wrote:
|>
|>> Since you are running autovacuum I doubt the doing vacuumdb -a -z is 3
|>> times a day buying you much.  It's not a bad idea to do once in a while.
|>
|>
|>
|> The reason is that I have few tables of about 5 milion with ~ 10000
|> insert per
|> day. Even with setting  -v 300 -V 0.1 this means these tables will be
|> analyzed
|> each 50 days. So I  have to force it.
|
|
| I understand, but 10,000 new rows increate your table size only 0.2%, so
| it won't significantly effect anything.  Also, if they really are just
| inserts then vacuum is totally unnecessary.  I agree that for these
| situations pg_autovacuum should be supplemented by vacuumdb -a -z every
| once in a while, all I was pointing out was that 3 times a day is
| probably excessive.

Right, but the table collect logs, so is mandatory have the statistics up-to-date
in order to obtain index scan for queries that are involving the last 24 hours.
For the vacuum vs the analyze I do vacuum because other tables are not in this
category of "only update" so instead of write tons of line in my crontab I prefer
only one line.



Regards
Gaetano Mendola






-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFBYYm77UpzwH2SGd4RAmilAJ98skWgiKI7mqOgYIgigzgpLe0JpQCfRm8/
IPXFZwZVcdJP0RQCE1fPXpw=
=CExm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Bruno Wolff III
Date:
Subject: Re: Random not so random
Next
From: "Jimmie H. Apsey"
Date:
Subject: LOST REFERENTIAL INTEGRITY