Tom Lane schrieb:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
>
>>I'm not sure exactly what Bruce checked, so I just spent a few cycles
>>making sure that we did not inadvertantly pick up a define of WIN32 from
>>windows.h anywhere else. I *think* we are OK on that. However, ISTM this
>>is a foot just waiting to be shot - in retrospect using WIN32 as our
>>marker for native Windows, which we do in a great many places (around
>>300 by my count) was a less than stellar choice, given that it is
>>defined by windows.h, and especially since we use that header for Cygwin
>>as well as for Windows native in a few places.
>
>
> Well, it's easily changed, if all that's needed is a search-and-replace.
> Suggestions for a better name?
MINGW32
--
Reini Urban
http://xarch.tu-graz.ac.at/home/rurban/
