On 8/25/2004 1:32 AM, Greg Stark wrote:
> A dirty read is a read that includes data that hasn't been committed yet. Or
> as the SQL 92 standard puts it:
[...]
> It could also be useful for referential integrity checks since, for example,
> it would let you see if someone has deleted the referenced record but not
> committed the delete yet.
>
> But that alone wouldn't let you avoid locking the record, TODO items are
> mostly just pointers to old threads on the mailing lists. They don't contain
> the complete story. You could maybe find more information searching the
> pgsql-hackers archive on the web site.
Plus ... wouldn't doing the "on delete" lookup as dirty reads let
referencing rows that have been deleted but still could come back
through a rollback disappear? What you want to see are new tuples of
uncommitted insert/update as well as old tuples of uncommitted
delete/update. I don't think there is any term in the standard for that
read mode, so we should call it dusty-reads because they see everything
vacuum is interested in.
Jan
--
#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#================================================== JanWieck@Yahoo.com #
