Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql-server: Rearrange pg_subtrans - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Gavin Sherry
Subject Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql-server: Rearrange pg_subtrans
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.58.0408251557260.6905@linuxworld.com.au
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql-server: Rearrange pg_subtrans handling  (Mark Kirkwood <markir@coretech.co.nz>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, 25 Aug 2004, Mark Kirkwood wrote:

>
>
> Greg Stark wrote:
>
> > It's only allowed when the transaction is in READ UNCOMMITTED
> > isolation level.
> >
> >Something Postgres doesn't currently support. In fact I'm not aware of any SQL
> >database that supports it, though I'm sure there's one somewhere.
> >
> >
> >
> FYI - DB2 supports this isolation level, I don't know of any others (tho
> Informix is a possibility).

I wasn't aware pf DB2 supporting it, but SQL Server and Informix do.
Oracle only supports COMMITTED and SERIALIZABLE according to my 10g
manual.

Gavin


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Philip Yarra
Date:
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql-server: Rearrange pg_subtrans handling
Next
From: Jan Wieck
Date:
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql-server: Rearrange pg_subtrans handling