Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql-server: Rearrange pg_subtrans handling - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Mark Kirkwood
Subject Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql-server: Rearrange pg_subtrans handling
Date
Msg-id 412C299E.30609@coretech.co.nz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql-server: Rearrange pg_subtrans handling  (Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu>)
Responses Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql-server: Rearrange pg_subtrans handling  (Philip Yarra <philip@utiba.com>)
Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql-server: Rearrange pg_subtrans  (Gavin Sherry <swm@linuxworld.com.au>)
List pgsql-hackers

Greg Stark wrote:

> It's only allowed when the transaction is in READ UNCOMMITTED 
> isolation level.
>
>Something Postgres doesn't currently support. In fact I'm not aware of any SQL
>database that supports it, though I'm sure there's one somewhere.
>
>  
>
FYI - DB2 supports this isolation level, I don't know of any others (tho 
Informix is a possibility).

regards

Mark


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Greg Stark
Date:
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql-server: Rearrange pg_subtrans handling
Next
From: Philip Yarra
Date:
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql-server: Rearrange pg_subtrans handling