> On 24 Feb 2023, at 16:19, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>
> Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se> writes:
>> I happened to notice that there were a few references to guc.c regarding
>> variables, which with the recent refactoring in 0a20ff54f have become stale.
>> Attached is a trivial patch to instead point to guc_tables.c.
>
> Hmm, I think you may have done an overenthusiastic replacement here.
Fair enough, I only changed those places I felt referenced variables, or their
definition, in guc_tables.c but I agree that there is a lot of greyzone in the
interpretation.
> Perhaps you could use "the GUC mechanisms" in these places, but it's a bit
> longer than "guc.c". Leaving such references alone seems OK too.
I've opted for mostly leaving them in the attached v2.
--
Daniel Gustafsson
