Dave Cramer wrote:
> Oliver,
>
> Yes, and this is why I needed to do it for getLong, but I don't think
> it's necessary for getInt, getByte, as it is really just to test to see
> if it is greater than the max allowed value.
Sure, but my original comment was that I would like to see a consistent
approach for all conversions, not one approach for longs and another for
the other types.
-O
