Re: patch for getXXX methods - Mailing list pgsql-jdbc

From Dave Cramer
Subject Re: patch for getXXX methods
Date
Msg-id 1089643844.1515.337.camel@localhost.localdomain
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: patch for getXXX methods  (Oliver Jowett <oliver@opencloud.com>)
Responses Re: patch for getXXX methods
List pgsql-jdbc
The reason I use the Double.... is because I am assuming it is faster,
if this is not true, then there is no reason to use your suggestion.

Dave
On Mon, 2004-07-12 at 10:36, Oliver Jowett wrote:
> Dave Cramer wrote:
> > Oliver,
> >
> > Yes, and this is why I needed to do it for getLong, but I don't think
> > it's necessary for getInt, getByte, as it is really just to test to see
> > if it is greater than the max allowed value.
>
> Sure, but my original comment was that I would like to see a consistent
> approach for all conversions, not one approach for longs and another for
> the other types.
>
> -O
>
>
>
> !DSPAM:40f2a228268032766713856!
>
>
--
Dave Cramer
519 939 0336
ICQ # 14675561


pgsql-jdbc by date:

Previous
From: Oliver Jowett
Date:
Subject: Re: patch for getXXX methods
Next
From: Oliver Jowett
Date:
Subject: Re: patch for getXXX methods