> Please remove that; if I thought either one was a good idea, I would
> have allowed it in the committed patch.
>
> Sequences are too small to be worth moving around, and may someday be
> reimplemented in a fashion that doesn't use up a separate disk file for
> each one. If we allow SET TABLESPACE on them we will be limiting our
> future flexibility for no useful gain.
Why do we allow them to be created in tablespaces in the first place
then? Seems like a bit of a misfeature? I mean we don't allow views in
tablespaces...
Chris
