Bruce Momjian wrote:
> elein wrote:
>
>>FYI: I'm agreeing w/Tom who is agreeing with me.
>>
>>The tag change should be good. I do hope people are
>>not relying on seeing COMMIT when the transaction
>>rolled back. It does not seem that in this case
>>they would.
>
>
> If it is a problem, hopefully we will hear about it during beta. I will
> mention is as a backward-compatibility issue in the release notes.
The JDBC driver when talking the V2 protocol (unusual for a recent
server, but possible) looks for either COMMIT or ROLLBACK when looking
for end-of-transaction, so it should be fine.
-O
