Re: [BUGS] BUG #1118: Misleading Commit message - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: [BUGS] BUG #1118: Misleading Commit message
Date
Msg-id 200407102102.i6AL2PD26342@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [BUGS] BUG #1118: Misleading Commit message  (elein <elein@varlena.com>)
Responses Re: [BUGS] BUG #1118: Misleading Commit message  (Oliver Jowett <oliver@opencloud.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
elein wrote:
> FYI: I'm agreeing w/Tom who is agreeing with me.
> 
> The tag change should be good.  I do hope people are
> not relying on seeing COMMIT when the transaction
> rolled back.  It does not seem that in this case
> they would.

If it is a problem, hopefully we will hear about it during beta.  I will
mention is as a backward-compatibility issue in the release notes.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------


> 
> elein
> 
> On Sat, Jul 10, 2004 at 04:13:49PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> > > As I remember, the big issue was how often applications are looking and
> > > comparing these tags to take actions.  I think we should return ROLLBACK
> > > on COMMIT failure and we can see if we get any problem reports during
> > > beta.
> > 
> > Good enough; I'll make it happen.
> > 
> >             regards, tom lane
> > 
> > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> > TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
> > 
> >                http://archives.postgresql.org
> 

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
359-1001+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: elein
Date:
Subject: Re: [BUGS] BUG #1118: Misleading Commit message
Next
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: Point in Time Recovery