Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> We can't actually release anything (commit the subtransactions), because
> they may be savepoints established after that point, and they are
> logically "inside" the previously established ones. At RELEASE we can't
> really release -- we just lose the name and thus the opportunity to
> rollback to it.
The 2003 draft claims that RELEASE SAVEPOINT invalidates savepoints
subsequent to the RELEASE:
1) Let S be the <savepoint name>.
2) If S does not identify a savepoint established in the current
savepoint level,then an exception condition is raised:savepoint
exception invalid specification.
3) The savepoint identified by S and all savepoints established in the
current savepoint level subsequent to the establishment of S are destroyed.
So it sounds like we can commit the subtransaction on RELEASE.
Note that this is *not* the same when a savepoint name is reused; that
just moves the name, but "contained" savepoints are still valid.
-O
