Re: Timestamp precision and rounding - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Jeff Boes
Subject Re: Timestamp precision and rounding
Date
Msg-id 40C4AF24.1060909@nexcerpt.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Timestamp precision and rounding  (Stephan Szabo <sszabo@megazone.bigpanda.com>)
List pgsql-general
Stephan Szabo wrote:

>On Thu, 3 Jun 2004, Jeff Boes wrote:
>
>
>
>>(asked last week on .questions, no response)
>>
>>Can anyone explain why this happens?  (under 7.4.1)
>>
>>    select '2004-05-27 09:00:00.500001-04' :: timestamp(0) ;
>>
>>          timestamp
>>    ---------------------
>>     2004-05-27 09:00:01
>>
>>
>>    select '2004-05-27 09:00:00.500000-04' :: timestamp(0) ;
>>
>>          timestamp
>>    ---------------------
>>     2004-05-27 09:00:00
>>
>>
>>That is, why doesn't the second operation result in the same timestamp
>>as the first? Is it a floating-point representation issue, or are the
>>mathematical rules of rounding not being followed correctly (as I
>>understand them, anyway)?
>>
>>
>
>My first guess would be that your system probably implements its default
>rounding as nearest even for .5 results, what does 9:00:01.5 give you?
>
>
2004-05-27 09:00:02, so I guess  that would confirm it.


--
Jeff Boes                                      vox 269.226.9550 ext 24
Database Engineer                                     fax 269.349.9076
Nexcerpt, Inc.                                 http://www.nexcerpt.com
           ...Nexcerpt... Extend your Expertise


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Bill Moran
Date:
Subject: Re: postgres on SuSE 9.1
Next
From: lbrtchx@hotmail.com (Albretch)
Date:
Subject: Re: CREATE DATABASE on the heap with PostgreSQL?