Re: SET WITHOUT CLUSTER patch - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Christopher Kings-Lynne
Subject Re: SET WITHOUT CLUSTER patch
Date
Msg-id 4094FD2B.3050904@familyhealth.com.au
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: SET WITHOUT CLUSTER patch  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: SET WITHOUT CLUSTER patch  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
>>Actually, it occurs to me that the SET WITHOUT CLUSTER form CAN recurse. 
>>   Should I make it do that, even though the CLUSTER ON form cannot?
> 
> I just thought about this.  CLUSTER is more of a storage-level
> specification, rather than a logical one.  Seems it is OK that WITOUTH
> CLUSTER not recurse into inherited tables, especially since the CLUSTER
> command does not.

The patch I submitted earlier already does do recursion - I don't see 
why it shouldn't really.  It's better than failing saying that legal 
grammar is in fact illegal :)

Chris



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: Fixed directory locations in installs
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: SET WITHOUT CLUSTER patch