Re: Update on 'portal' changes - Mailing list pgsql-www

From Alexey Borzov
Subject Re: Update on 'portal' changes
Date
Msg-id 404CA93D.6030102@cs.msu.su
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Update on 'portal' changes  ("Dave Page" <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>)
Responses Re: Update on 'portal' changes  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
List pgsql-www
Hi!

Dave Page wrote:
>>Speaking of which, what is the real reason for keeping the
>>current website and the "next-generation" one in one project?
>>
>>Maybe a better approach would be to register a separate
>>project for the next-generation website (I think this was
>>already proposed here)?
>
> Because the project is for all the websites, not just the one you are
> working on.

OK, let's paraphrase: what is the reason for having one project for all websites
instead of one project per website? I got the impression that *different*
developers work on different websites...

> We *have* created a separate CVS module which should be more than enough
> segregation.

Can CVS write access be given for this module only?



pgsql-www by date:

Previous
From: "Dave Page"
Date:
Subject: Re: Update on 'portal' changes
Next
From: "Dave Page"
Date:
Subject: Re: Update on 'portal' changes