Re: Slow response of PostgreSQL - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Christopher Kings-Lynne
Subject Re: Slow response of PostgreSQL
Date
Msg-id 4031BBBC.5050002@familyhealth.com.au
Whole thread Raw
In response to Slow response of PostgreSQL  ("Saleem Burhani Baloch" <peseek@khi.wol.net.pk>)
Responses Re: Slow response of PostgreSQL  (Bill Moran <wmoran@potentialtech.com>)
List pgsql-performance
> select count(*), sum(vl_ex_stax) , sum(qty) , unit from inv_detail group by unit;
> on both databases.
>
> PostgreSQL return result in 50 sec every time.
> MS-SQL     return result in  2 sec every time.

> My PostgreSQL Conf is
> *********************
> log_connections = yes
> syslog = 2
> effective_cache_size = 327680
> sort_mem = 10485760
> max_connections = 64
> shared_buffers = 512
> wal_buffers = 1024

This is a shockingly bad postgresql.conf.  I'm not surprised you have
performance problems.  Change this:

effective_cache_size = 4000
sort_mem = 4096
shared_buffers = 1000
wal_buffers = 8

Also, you need a LOT more RAM in your PostgreSQL machine, at least half
a gig for a basic database server.

> 1- How can I lock a single record so that other users can only read it. ??

You cannot do that in PostgreSQL.

> 2- one user executes a query it will be process and when another user executes the same query having the same result
shouldnot again go for processing. The result should be come from the cache. Is this possible in postgres ?? 

No, implement it in your application.  Prepared queries and stored
procedures might help you here.

Chris


pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: "Saleem Burhani Baloch"
Date:
Subject: Slow response of PostgreSQL
Next
From: Stephan Szabo
Date:
Subject: Re: Slow response of PostgreSQL