Slow response of PostgreSQL - Mailing list pgsql-performance
From | Saleem Burhani Baloch |
---|---|
Subject | Slow response of PostgreSQL |
Date | |
Msg-id | 200402170624.i1H6O2u16022@ns2.khi.wol.net.pk Whole thread Raw |
Responses |
Re: Slow response of PostgreSQL
Re: Slow response of PostgreSQL Re: Slow response of PostgreSQL Re: Slow response of PostgreSQL |
List | pgsql-performance |
Hello, I m checking Postgresql and MS-SQl database server for our new development. On a very first query Postresql is out performedand I think it is very disappointing. My query consists on a single table only on both machines. Table Structure Table "inv_detail" Attribute | Type | Modifier --------------+-----------------------+-------------------- inv_no | integer | not null unit_id | character(4) | not null item | character varying(90) | not null qty | double precision | not null default 0 rate | double precision | not null default 0 unit | character varying(20) | not null vl_ex_stax | double precision | not null default 0 stax_prc | double precision | not null default 0 adl_stax_prc | double precision | not null default 0 package | character varying(12) | Having 440,000 Records. My Query -------- select count(*), sum(vl_ex_stax) , sum(qty) , unit from inv_detail group by unit; on both databases. PostgreSQL return result in 50 sec every time. MS-SQL return result in 2 sec every time. MS-SQL Machine ************** Athlon 600Mhz. (Unbranded) 256 MB Ram. ( 133 Mhz) 40 GB Baracude NTFS File System. Windows 2000 Server Enterprise. MS-SQL 2000 Enterprise. (Default Settings) PostgreSQL Machine ****************** P-III 600Mhz (Dell Precision 220) 256 MB Ram (RD Ram) 40 GB Baracuda Ext2 File System. RedHat 7.2 PostgreSQL 7.1.3-2 My PostgreSQL Conf is ********************* log_connections = yes syslog = 2 effective_cache_size = 327680 sort_mem = 10485760 max_connections = 64 shared_buffers = 512 wal_buffers = 1024 NOTICE: QUERY PLAN: ******************** Aggregate (cost=inf..inf rows=44000 width=28) -> Group (cost=inf..inf rows=440000 width=28) -> Sort (cost=inf..inf rows=440000 width=28) -> Seq Scan on inv_detail (cost=0.00..11747.00 rows=440000 width=28) EXPLAIN Even if I dont compare postgres with any other database server the time taken is alarmingly high. These settings are notgood I know, but the Postgres result is very un-acceptable. I m looking forward for comments to change the conf settingfor acceptable results. And I have two more questions : 1- How can I lock a single record so that other users can only read it. ?? 2- one user executes a query it will be process and when another user executes the same query having the same result shouldnot again go for processing. The result should be come from the cache. Is this possible in postgres ?? Saleem pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
pgsql-performance by date: