> Those two cases are not hard, because in those scenarios the parser
> knows it is expecting a type specification. The real problem is this
> syntax for typed literals:
> typename 'string'
> which occurs in ordinary expressions. So when you see "name(" you
> aren't real sure if you're seeing the start of a function call or the
> start of a typed-literal construct. And it's very hard to postpone that
> decision until you see what comes after the right paren.
Just disallow that particular case for custom types :P
Will this work: 'string'::typename
Chris
