Tom Lane wrote:
>
>The fact that RI triggers issue SQL commands is an artifact of
>their implementation (and one that I believe Stephan and Jan would like
>to get rid of); they shouldn't be cluttering the log at all.
>
>
I am glad you mentioned that - I did find myself wondering why it was
necessary to go through the whole parse->plan->etc business, when the
backend "knows" that an access via the (required) primary key is going
to be available...
cheers
Mark
