Re: New trigger option of pg_standby - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Fujii Masao
Subject Re: New trigger option of pg_standby
Date
Msg-id 3f0b79eb0904071817u5c32254ei61f7e68e54669d9e@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: New trigger option of pg_standby  (Guillaume Smet <guillaume.smet@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: New trigger option of pg_standby  (Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Hi,

On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 6:56 AM, Guillaume Smet <guillaume.smet@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 5:42 AM, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Here is the patch;
>> - Smart failover is chosen if the trigger file labeled "smart" or
>>  an empty one exists.
>> - Fast failover is chosen if the trigger file labeled "fast" exists,
>>  the signal (SIGUSR1 or SIGINT) is received or the wait timeout
>>  happens.
>
> After some further thoughts, +1 for this approach too.
>
> I think you imply 'containing "smart"' not 'labeled "smart"'.
> "Labeled" is confusing IMHO.

Thanks for the comment!
I corrected such confusing expression.

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Hiroshi Inoue
Date:
Subject: Re: More message encoding woes
Next
From: Chris Dunlop
Date:
Subject: Re: a few crazy ideas about hash joins