Re: Differential code coverage between 16 and HEAD - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jeff Davis
Subject Re: Differential code coverage between 16 and HEAD
Date
Msg-id 3e117f7388c26c11b05e642ed347ba533b456394.camel@j-davis.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to [MASSMAIL]Differential code coverage between 16 and HEAD  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Responses Re: Differential code coverage between 16 and HEAD
List pgsql-hackers
On Sun, 2024-04-14 at 15:33 -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> - Coverage for some of the new unicode code is pretty poor:
>  
> https://anarazel.de/postgres/cov/16-vs-HEAD-2024-04-14/src/common/unicode_category.c.gcov.html#L122

Thank you for looking. Those functions are tested by category_test.c
which is run with the 'update-unicode' target.

Better testing in the SQL tests might be good, but the existing tests
are near-exhaustive, so I'm not terribly worried. Also, it's possible
not all of them are reachable by SQL, yet, because some of the later
patches in the series didn't land in 17.

Regards,
    Jeff Davis




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Time to back-patch libxml deprecation fixes?
Next
From: Justin Pryzby
Date:
Subject: Re: pg17 issues with not-null contraints