Re: Time to back-patch libxml deprecation fixes? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Time to back-patch libxml deprecation fixes?
Date
Msg-id 1018763.1713224558@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Time to back-patch libxml deprecation fixes?  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Responses Re: Time to back-patch libxml deprecation fixes?
List pgsql-hackers
Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> writes:
> On Mon, Apr 15, 2024 at 07:14:22PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I could switch the animal to use -Wno-deprecated-declarations in the
>> back branches, but I'd rather not.  I think the right answer is to
>> back-patch Michael's 65c5864d7 (xml2: Replace deprecated routines with
>> recommended ones).  We speculated about that at the time (see e.g.,
>> 400928b83) but didn't pull the trigger.  I think 65c5864d7 has now
>> baked long enough that it'd be safe to back-patch.

> Would you prefer if I do it?

Please, if you have the time.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jeff Davis
Date:
Subject: [18] clarify the difference between pg_wchar, wchar_t, and Unicode code points
Next
From: Jeff Davis
Date:
Subject: Re: Differential code coverage between 16 and HEAD