Re: [BUGS] Routine analyze of single column prevents standard autoanalyze from running at all - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jim Nasby
Subject Re: [BUGS] Routine analyze of single column prevents standard autoanalyze from running at all
Date
Msg-id 3d9303dc-f99c-b63c-73be-aa2214bebe73@BlueTreble.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [BUGS] Routine analyze of single column prevents standard autoanalyze from running at all  (Josh berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
Responses Re: [BUGS] Routine analyze of single column prevents standard autoanalyze from running at all  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 6/6/16 3:23 PM, Josh berkus wrote:
> On 06/06/2016 01:38 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>
>> Also, I'd be a bit inclined to disable the counter reset whenever a column
>> list is specified, disregarding the corner case where a list is given but
>> it includes all the table's analyzable columns.  It doesn't really seem
>> worth the effort to account for that case specially (especially after
>> you consider that index expressions should count as analyzable columns).
>>
>> Thoughts?
>
> +1.  Better to err on the side of duplicate analyzes than none at all.
>
> Also, I'm not surprised this took so long to discover; I doubt most
> users are aware that you *can* analyze individual columns.

Is there any significant advantage to not analyzing all columns? Only 
case I can think of is if you have a fair number of columns that have 
been toasted; otherwise I'd think IO would completely swamp any other 
considerations.
-- 
Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting, Austin TX
Experts in Analytics, Data Architecture and PostgreSQL
Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com
855-TREBLE2 (855-873-2532)   mobile: 512-569-9461



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: installcheck failing on psql_crosstab
Next
From: Amit Langote
Date:
Subject: Typo in pg_visibility