Re: jsonpath - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tomas Vondra
Subject Re: jsonpath
Date
Msg-id 3d3d4876-3084-c339-ce0a-d8b7e96a38d3@2ndquadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: jsonpath  (Nikita Glukhov <n.gluhov@postgrespro.ru>)
Responses Re: jsonpath  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
BTW is the v19 really just a rebase of the preceding version?

I'm asking because v18 was adding two types into pg_type.dat, namely
jsonpath (6050) and _jsonpath (6051), while v19 only adds jsonpath
(6050). I've noticed because v18 was missing a comma between the two
entries, which I'd say is a bug - interestingly enough, both types were
created correctly, so it seems to be resilient to such typos.

regards

-- 
Tomas Vondra                  http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tomas Vondra
Date:
Subject: Re: jsonpath
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: ATTACH/DETACH PARTITION CONCURRENTLY