Re: jsonpath - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: jsonpath
Date
Msg-id 30161.1541653975@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: jsonpath  (Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: jsonpath
List pgsql-hackers
Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> BTW is the v19 really just a rebase of the preceding version?
> I'm asking because v18 was adding two types into pg_type.dat, namely
> jsonpath (6050) and _jsonpath (6051), while v19 only adds jsonpath
> (6050).

I haven't looked at this patch, but manual generation of array type entries
is obsolete since 3dc820c43e427371b66d217f2bd5481fc9ef2e2d.  There should
still be a mention of the OID to use for the array type though ...

            regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Gierth
Date:
Subject: Re: Adding a TAP test checking data consistency on standby with minRecoveryPoint
Next
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Generic type subscripting