Re: Paypal - Mailing list pgsql-advocacy
From | Joshua D. Drake |
---|---|
Subject | Re: Paypal |
Date | |
Msg-id | 3FFB22CE.1060202@commandprompt.com Whole thread Raw |
In response to | Re: Paypal (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>) |
List | pgsql-advocacy |
It's mostly in the 25-page Terms Of Service document, which I can no longer access without having an account (which I do not).
You can access it right here:
http://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=p/gen/ua/ua-outside
They also include information about FDIC pass through insurance here:
http://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=p/gen/fdic-outside
The above link also includes links to the banks where the money is kept and an
additional link to the user agreement.
And if we keep a balance with them, we can turn it into a Money Market account.
They even have a fairly extensive privacy policy.
Also per paypalsucks.com, although I have not read the entire site it appears to be
fairly inaccurate to real facts.
PaypalSucks says:
- It is difficult to find the phone number to Paypal:
It was very easy to find under About us, and under the privacy agreement. It was easier to find
their phone number than many other "Online Businesses"
- PaypalSucks says: According to PayPal accepting their ToS (Terms of Service) in effect means you waive your rights
- to credit card consumer protection laws, and that you may not issue a chargeback for anything you purchase -using your credit card and PayPal account that you are unsatisfied with. Is this legal? We don't know. But it's how - Paypal operates.
Actually paypal has extensive protection policies including buyer and seller which is a rarity. Visa for example HEAVILY
favors the buyer which is a real pain the but for a lot of legitamate business that deal with fraudulent customers.
Now all of this may be the way "it used to be", but I don't think that is the way it is anymore. Paypal has become
the preferred method of payment per Ebay (for obvious reasons) and that carries quite a bit of responsibility.
I am not saying they are perfect but EBay has done a lot of good things and I personally find that the good far
out weighs the bad.
It is kind of like the old saying, "One bad voice is heard by a million ears. A million good voices are only heard by one ear."
(o.k. I made that up, but I think you get might drift)
All bearing action against previous behavior (presumably before the Ebay buy out).I have to admit that I've also heavily perused paypalsucks.com, and was discouraged by the number of reports there in 2002. And there's the class-action lawsuit still proceeding in California and Nebraska.
Yes that is very true. I know that it will be alot easier for my international customers once they are firmlyHowever, looking at paypalsucks.com, the number of serious angry-customer reports seems to have decreased sharply in 2003. This may indicate a change of practice by Paypal in the wake of negative publicity. Also, apparently in a month they will be supervised by the British Financial Authority, which has *got* to mean some cleaning house.
entrenched in Europe.
The reason I think Paypal is not a bad idea is that most people I know have a paypal account. However,
if it is feasible we might as well just get a merchant account for the non profit. Then we could even accept
e-check.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
-- Command Prompt, Inc., home of Mammoth PostgreSQL - S/ODBC and S/JDBC Postgresql support, programming shared hosting and dedicated hosting. +1-503-222-2783 - jd@commandprompt.com - http://www.commandprompt.com
pgsql-advocacy by date: