Re: CVS HEAD compile failure - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: CVS HEAD compile failure
Date
Msg-id 3FD4C40D.6050409@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: CVS HEAD compile failure  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:

>Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
>  
>
>>Tom Lane wrote:
>>    
>>
>>>I've been able to reproduce this on one of my machines, and it's nasty.
>>>      
>>>
>
>  
>
>>In that case I'm confused about why this code compiles on my machine:
>>    
>>
>
>What compiler are you using?  I'm using gcc 2.95.3 (on the machine that
>shows the failure), and I think Bruce is also using something less than
>the latest.  It's possible that more recent gcc's are able to figure out
>that the reference to free_func should be interpreted as a parameter
>name and not a typedef.
>
>In fact, trying your test program fails here:
>
>$ gcc -Wall zzz.c
>zzz.c:8: parse error before `free_func'
>zzz.c:8: parse error before `)'
>$ 
>
>so "compiler difference" definitely seems to be the answer.
>
>  
>
gcc version 3.2.2 20030222 (Red Hat Linux 3.2.2-5)

cheers

andrew



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: aggregate + view + alias crash on 7.4 stable
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: 73.5 and uw 713