Re: Open Sourcing pgManage - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Joshua D. Drake
Subject Re: Open Sourcing pgManage
Date
Msg-id 3FA8036B.9050804@commandprompt.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Open Sourcing pgManage  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Responses Re: Open Sourcing pgManage
List pgsql-hackers
Hello,
 If that is the case that is fine. I just wanted to throw it out there 
but doesn't that mean that
psql would be separate as well?

J

Peter Eisentraut wrote:

>Joshua D. Drake writes:
>
>  
>
>>  I thought that we might donate it to the project as a whole. What are
>>people's thoughts on
>>this?
>>    
>>
>
>I think the decision has been made that no new client applications will be
>included with PostgreSQL.  We will provide a server and let a happy bunch
>of client applications and libraries develop around it.  That has worked
>out pretty well lately, I think.
>
>  
>


-- 
Command Prompt, Inc., home of Mammoth PostgreSQL - S/ODBC and S/JDBC
Postgresql support, programming shared hosting and dedicated hosting.
+1-503-222-2783 - jd@commandprompt.com - http://www.commandprompt.com
Editor-N-Chief - PostgreSQl.Org - http://www.postgresql.org 




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Open Sourcing pgManage
Next
From: Rod Taylor
Date:
Subject: Re: Open Sourcing pgManage